Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8603
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191209
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 04 '20 at 21:42
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9880H 11,095 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Memory 93.9 1-Core 137 2-Core 267 93% 166 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 847 81% 670 Pts	64-Core 1,287 80% 1,287 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile) 4,380 User benchmarks, average bench 112% HP(103C 8603) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	110% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 152 Parallax 141 116% 145 fps	MRender 170 Gravity 126 Splatting 100 104% 132 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$96 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 732GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 801 1527 1687 1587 1555 1540 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	283% Outstanding	Read 1,640 Write 1,981 Mixed 1,268 SusWrite 1,450 357% 1,585 MB/s	4K Read 61.6 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 82 266% 90.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,095 DQ Write 952 DQ Mixed 1,027 769% 1,025 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 283% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$96 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 501GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2034 2040 1463 1401 1408 1432 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	294% Outstanding	Read 1,769 Write 1,801 Mixed 1,527 SusWrite 1,629 379% 1,682 MB/s	4K Read 59.2 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 76.1 250% 84.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,112 DQ Write 961 DQ Mixed 1,030 774% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 294% Great: 410%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 959GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 404 437 441 443 410 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 424 Mixed 392 SusWrite 394 96% 425 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 71 4K Mixed 41.5 136% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 258 209% 297 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GB 3,055 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	MC Read 32 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 26.5 88% 31 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 36.8 SC Mixed 26.4 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 59.9 67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

GPU
GeForce RTX 2070NvidiaBench 89%, 5,557 samples	447x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	411x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	318x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	259x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	207x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	97x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	378x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	120x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	113x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16