Asus A8N-SLI SE

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A8N-SLI SE (all builds)
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20060309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 04 '20 at 19:23
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 3700+ 20 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Memory 70.5 1-Core 29.8 2-Core 19.1 32% 39.8 Pts	4-Core 27.2 8-Core 31.3 4% 29.2 Pts	64-Core 31 2% 31 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7300 GS 41 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Asus(1043 81F3) 256MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.18.13.908 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.24 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.16% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4004RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 72 79 68 86 77 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.1% Very poor	Read 89.3 Write 87.2 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 72.7 18% 79 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 9.3 33% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 16.4 DQ Write 19 DQ Mixed 16.9 13% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 56%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84 9,234 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 675GB free Firmware: ST6OA3AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 87 89 89 88 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 80.3 Write 85.6 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 86.9 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 63%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 81GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 78 77 77 78 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 134 Write 132 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 76.2 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 74%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 199GB free Firmware: CR100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 70 70 70 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 65 Write 68.7 Mixed 42.9 SusWrite 69.4 45% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.1 8% 2.97 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 2.3 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16