Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus M32CD4-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170106
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMay 04 '20 at 18:43
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 124
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 670
71% 566 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 0862) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 7.72
5% 7.19 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.17
5% 6.36 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
731GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 137 147 138 141 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 164
Write 173
Mixed 74
SusWrite 139
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
515GB free
Firmware: MN6OA5Q0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 104 103 105 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 68
Write 74.2
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 103
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
401GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 76 79 76 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 79.5
Write 50.2
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 75.1
78% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 32%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
127GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 35 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 35
Write 32.5
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 37.8
44% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 33%
ST4000VN 000-1H4168 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 70 75 79 76 85 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
Read 159
Write 170
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 76.6
155% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus M32CD4-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback