Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 04 '20 at 14:30
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 403
54% 403 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
MSI(1462 2843) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
28% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 42.2
27% 36.6 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 29.2
29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 328 287 399 373 458 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 445
Mixed 384
SusWrite 374
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57
188% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 89.3
Write 95
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 91.2
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 83%
HDD 250GB
56GB free, PID 2551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 40.2
Write 40.2
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 38
54% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 15.3
1,192% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 19.2
DQ Mixed 16.2
1,258% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 134%
HDD 500GB
252GB free, PID 2551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 40
Write 40.8
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 4.9
41% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 13.7
1,105% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 11.8
DQ Write 19.1
DQ Mixed 14.5
1,187% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 12.4
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2 - $183

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $831
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback