Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 04 '20 at 01:07
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 194
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 374
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.8% Below average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 65.3
37% 57.8 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 51.9
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1091 880 875 867 870 868 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,555
Write 2,394
Mixed 1,873
SusWrite 908
432% 1,933 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 86.1
281% 96.4 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 606
DQ Mixed 654
492% 658 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 275%
Great: 346%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
56GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 55 55 55 56 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 393
Write 192
Mixed 269
SusWrite 88.6
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 22.8
116% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 132
134% 211 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDT721050SLA360 500GB-$66
321GB free
Firmware: ST3OA38E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 98
Write 95.8
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 101
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 F4-2400C15-8GNT 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 30
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 24.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback