Compaq EX318AA-ABA SR1920NX NA630

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Compaq EX318AA-ABA SR1920NX NA630 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek NAGAMI2L
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060413
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 04 '20 at 00:32
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ 15 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 31.9 2-Core 31.7 34% 44.3 Pts	4-Core 31.7 8-Core 32.2 4% 32 Pts	64-Core 32.1 2% 32.1 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 1,212 User benchmarks, average bench 1% EVGA(3842 C554) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.97% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.41 2% 1.21 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.97% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar SS D 480GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: R042 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 85 100 101 102 101 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.1% Below average	Read 128 Write 103 Mixed 112 SusWrite 94.3 25% 109 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 24.8 76% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 47.3 DQ Write 44.9 DQ Mixed 40.6 32% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 148GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 83 98 99 99 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	54% Above average	Read 97.1 Write 27.3 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 90.9 49% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 68%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 6,865 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 10GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.1 4.4 4.3 4.1 4.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Read 15.6 Write 2.8 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.3 7% 6.75 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 8%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID c75d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 4.9 10 12 6 4.9 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	9.19% Terrible	Read 28.9 Write 5.5 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 7.2 11% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 72% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.19% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3 11% 3.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16