Biostar J3160NH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar J3160NH  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '20 at 14:04
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3160
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 44.8
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 44.1
25% 37.1 Pts
4-Core 83.7
8-Core 84.7
11% 84.2 Pts
64-Core 84.7
5% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Biostar(1565 1114) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 1.93
Reflection 2.77
Parallax 2.72
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.65 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-E Extreme 64GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 045C8860
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 166 167 178 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 233
Write 169
Mixed 196
SusWrite 168
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 12.5
62% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 114
98% 143 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
155GB free
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 21 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 102
Write 65.5
Mixed 55
SusWrite 20.1
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35%
Great: 69%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
72GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 94.7
Write 91.3
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 75.1
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 54%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
72GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 76
Write 62.7
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 57.7
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 54%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
155GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 21 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 66.7
Write 65
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 20.2
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 54%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
196GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 12.2
Write 20.5
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 37.7
34% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-106.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J3160NH Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar J3160NH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback