| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 67.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Dell Studio XPS 435MT (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0R849J |
| Memory | 9.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090505 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | May 02 '20 at 22:50 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.3%
Good
|
61% 98.7 Pts
|
36% 288 Pts
|
22% 349 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
67.5%
Good
|
63% 89.1 fps
|
76% 94.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 201 148 46 30 26 MB/s
|
48.8%
Average
|
41% 182 MB/s
|
101% 34 MB/s
|
37% 49 MB/s
|
|
WD My Book Duo 0A10 3TB
2TB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 34 34 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
44% 32.8 MB/s
|
61% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 14GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.9%
Below average
|
28% 9.83 GB/s
|
26% 9 GB/s
|
60% 66.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 321 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 270x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 18x |
| Xeon W3580IntelBench 72%, 653 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 17x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 13x |
| Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $184 |