Dell Precision M6500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision M6500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R1203
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 21:11
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 920-$90
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 77
2-Core 131
64% 101 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 250
28% 221 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 2800M
Dell(1028 02EF) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 7.67
Reflection 8.31
Parallax 2.44
6% 6.14 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 5.57
Splatting 5.48
5% 6.09 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 426GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 52 82 139 133 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 338
Write 247
Mixed 118
SusWrite 105
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 10.2
41% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 57.8
DQ Mixed 21.6
22% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34%
Great: 131%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 86GB
80GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 53 83 139 133 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 409
Write 214
Mixed 125
SusWrite 106
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 10.6
37% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 56.4
DQ Mixed 23.2
22% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M6500 Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback