Asus H110M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-D  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 14:52
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 153
73% 119 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 286
35% 267 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 3.41
4% 4.33 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.52
4% 4.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS330 240GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2PD0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 79 82 51 53 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 438
Write 410
Mixed 257
SusWrite 92.5
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 23.2
109% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 107
137% 245 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
373GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 55 49 30 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 17
Write 68.3
Mixed 3.3
SusWrite 46.5
24% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 2,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback