To Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 14:04
Run Duration396 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2-$142
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 166
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 709
64% 537 Pts
64-Core 1112
69% 1112 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.3% Very good
Lighting 96.3
Reflection 107
Parallax 83.3
78% 95.6 fps
MRender 87.4
Gravity 87.5
Splatting 89
72% 88 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
794GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1997 1005 1007 1007 929 822 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,197
Write 1,182
Mixed 1,527
SusWrite 1,128
284% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 51.8
161% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 545
395% 514 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 190%
Great: 310%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$139
2TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 170 168 175 176 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 208 205 204 205 209 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 115%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 189 186 184 170 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 115%
Hitachi HUH721010AL 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: T384
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 231 227 241 236 226 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 238
Mixed 135
SusWrite 231
153% 209 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.1
354% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 133%
Great: 140%
Hitachi HUH721008AL 8TB
88GB free
Firmware: T384
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 153 154 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 126
Write 128
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 154
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.4
335% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 128%
Hitachi HUH721008AL 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: T384
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 155 157 152 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 182
Mixed 122
SusWrite 154
120% 162 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 1.2
378% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 128%
Hitachi HUH721008AL 8TB
60GB free
Firmware: T384
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 120 148 176 146 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 144
Write 150
Mixed 118
SusWrite 142
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.5
376% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 128%
Hitachi HUH721008AL 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: T384
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 203 217 212 209 211 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 160
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 211
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.2
342% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
135GB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 188 182 182 191 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 158
Mixed 105
SusWrite 184
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
295% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
39GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 62 66 67 66 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 97.4
Write 100
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 64.3
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
178% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 63%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 154 156 155 163 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 115%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
931GB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 120 121 121 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 107
SusWrite 121
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 85 99 105 101 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 103
Write 113
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 102
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
173% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 101 108 107 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 99.1
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 105
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 37
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.9
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback