Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140812
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 16:31
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3250
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.6% Poor
Memory 25.1
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 65.7
28% 48.4 Pts
4-Core 89.3
8-Core 117
13% 103 Pts
64-Core 80.1
5% 80.1 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.28 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 2.26
2% 2.46 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 208 207 217 208 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 370
Write 273
Mixed 191
SusWrite 211
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 18.4
82% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 204
167% 240 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
347GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 102 102 104 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 144
Write 101
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 102
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.56% Terrible
MC Read 1.1
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 1.7
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 285
14% 285 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 7.56%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback