Toshiba Satellite L655

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite L655  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110627
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 16:19
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 77
2-Core 135
55% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 177
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Toshiba(1179 FD12) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 3.53
4% 4.37 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 3.03
Splatting 4.96
4% 4.19 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 150 59 62 18 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.2% Average
Read 249
Write 188
Mixed 214
SusWrite 83.9
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 16.6
63% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 135
112% 162 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST9750423AS 750GB-$74
86GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 48.3
Mixed 39
SusWrite 70.5
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 51%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB
8GB free, PID dd1b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 11 9.6 12 9.2 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 5
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 10.3
19% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.4
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L655 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L655

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback