Asus H110M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics71% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151116
Uptime13.2 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 09:51
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$134
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 102
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 294
38% 290 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71% Very good
Lighting 88.9
Reflection 93.6
Parallax 59.4
72% 80.6 fps
MRender 83.3
Gravity 81.3
Splatting 84.5
68% 83 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 156
Write 140
Mixed 128
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 22
66% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 84.3
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 117
89% 117 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
52GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 63 64 65 47 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 83.8
Write 76
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 55.2
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
5GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 50 50 50 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 49.7
Write 50
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 49.2
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-030.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.1% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,086 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback