HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP Laptop 15-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AD
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180531
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 02:12
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 81%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21% Poor
Memory 32.3
1-Core 42.2
2-Core 40.7
25% 38.4 Pts
4-Core 57.5
8-Core 58.4
8% 58 Pts
64-Core 54.3
3% 54.3 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 21%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 520
HP(103C 84AD) 2GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Lighting 8.07
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 9.69
7% 9.05 fps
MRender 7.86
Gravity 7.67
Splatting 9.48
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT23H3Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 322
Write 233
Mixed 289
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 26.8
91% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 129
99% 135 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 104%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
914GB free
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 123 130 131 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 112
Write 117
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 126
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 241
17% 241 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback