Acer Swift SF314-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Swift SF314-41  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Strongbow_PK
Memory15 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 00:49
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 543
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Acer(1025 1378) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 17
10% 14.5 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 17
12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ 512GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 685 507 512 520 522 519 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 524
Write 643
Mixed 574
SusWrite 544
129% 571 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 33.7
109% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 769
580% 778 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 123%
Great: 148%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 20GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-41 Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback