Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR (all builds)
Memory	22.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '20 at 17:41
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$120 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 91 2-Core 178 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 534 52% 429 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Lighting 63.7 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 72.3 52% 66.7 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 60.4 Splatting 53.3 48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 162 32 117 46 83 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.1% Poor	Read 171 Write 94.9 Mixed 85.2 SusWrite 105 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 8.5 37% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 15.5 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 118 88% 110 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 100%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 515GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 164 167 165 165 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 148 Write 143 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 164 96% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M1D3000C16 Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.2% Good	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 19.7 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 21 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	547x
Core i3-9100FIntel $120Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	226x
Core i5-8400Intel $120Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	118x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	134x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	121x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	90x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	161x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	69x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	59x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	97x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	71x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16