Toshiba SATELLITE L850-1UT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L850-1UT  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130403
Uptime14.7 Days
Run DateApr 30 '20 at 10:20
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 88
2-Core 164
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 323
38% 293 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 2.91
3% 4.61 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.78
5% 5.61 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 29 34 32 9.4 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 7
Write 50.7
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 29.4
17% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Kingston 99U5469-041.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.9
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback