Asrock B450M Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '20 at 02:41
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 306
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 784
81% 651 Pts
64-Core 1,079
67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 872C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Lighting 94.8
Reflection 85.3
Parallax 80.2
77% 86.8 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 76.1
72% 90.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0312C0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 511 308 697 268 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,437
Write 598
Mixed 739
SusWrite 384
174% 789 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 28.8
213% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 662
DQ Mixed 322
312% 486 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 167%
Great: 234%
P3-512 512GB
71GB free
Firmware: S0618B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 73 20 73 74 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45% Average
Read 505
Write 444
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 118
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 1.3
48% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 21.4
DQ Mixed 16.5
35% 77.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45%
Great: 104%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.5 3.9 4.1 3.6 4.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Read 11
Write 0.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.7
5% 4.95 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 33.2
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 32.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Steel Legend Builds (Compare 8,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Steel Legend - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $472
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback