Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181004
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 19:45
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 172
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 513
47% 395 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.1% Very good
Lighting 89.5
Reflection 90.7
Parallax 71.1
73% 83.8 fps
MRender 92.2
Gravity 89.6
Splatting 96.3
76% 92.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,712
Write 1,066
Mixed 1,531
319% 1,436 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 72.5
241% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 860
DQ Write 641
DQ Mixed 691
533% 730 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
204GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 457
Write 441
Mixed 374
94% 424 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 47
154% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 332
257% 351 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
770GB free
Firmware: CC4H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 182
Write 156
Mixed 83.5
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
481GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 190
Write 180
Mixed 94.5
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-029.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 26.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 16.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback