Notebook P775DM3(-G)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook P775DM3(-G)  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P775DM3(-G)
Memory16.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160713
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 19:39
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 228
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 635
64% 518 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7706) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.9% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 144
Parallax 121
103% 131 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 127
Splatting 105
93% 115 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 317 313 338 308 296 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,472
Write 686
Mixed 687
SusWrite 329
175% 793 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 49.5
176% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 451
342% 472 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 155%
Great: 220%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$99
304GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 350 400 401 398 402 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 471
Write 402
Mixed 265
SusWrite 383
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 25
101% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 282
229% 325 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 116%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 107 80 95 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48% Average
Read 76.3
Write 108
Mixed 54
SusWrite 90.5
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48%
Great: 68%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
873GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 101 102 105 101 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40% Average
Read 39.3
Write 76
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 100
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40%
Great: 68%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
214GB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 51 51 52 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 128
Write 104
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 51
113% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33%
Great: 66%
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB
298GB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 51 51 52 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.2% Poor
Read 99.3
Write 45.5
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 51.2
70% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 27.2
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P775DM3(-G) Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: Notebook P775DM3(-G)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback