Dell Latitude E5550

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E5550  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0PK2VC
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191003
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 14:55
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 157
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 228
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Dell(1028 062C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Lighting 5.33
Reflection 9.35
Parallax 6.62
4% 7.1 fps
MRender 7.05
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 10.5
6% 7.51 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300 256GB-$99
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3300012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 257 250 254 254 254 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 369
Write 320
Mixed 224
SusWrite 256
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 32.5
107% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 90.4
DQ Write 67.1
DQ Mixed 16.3
29% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E5550 Builds (Compare 984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback