Asrock H110M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 14:23
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 225
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 347
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
MSI(1462 2843) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 42.3
28% 36.8 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 28.7
30% 37 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 60GB-$65
10GB free
Firmware: 524ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 50 42 37 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.6% Below average
Read 148
Write 56.7
Mixed 79
SusWrite 44.7
18% 82 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 24.8
91% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 66.9
DQ Write 57.1
DQ Mixed 59.5
45% 61.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 77%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 389 414 410 393 421 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 399
Mixed 396
SusWrite 405
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 48.1
172% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 273
229% 331 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 112%
Great: 123%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
99GB free
Firmware: 04.01G01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 38 20 2.5 0 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 98.7
Write 99.8
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 19.2
55% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST1000NX0423 1TB
9GB free
Firmware: CT03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 62 61 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 56.1
Mixed 42.1
SusWrite 61.5
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
221% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 75%
Mass Storage Device 64GB
58GB free, PID 1212, shite
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 15 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Read 17
Write 3.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 13.6
12% 9.83 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX4M1A2133C15 Kingston 9905678-024.A00G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70.6% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 21.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 22.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback