MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 03:33
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 280
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 729
77% 617 Pts
64-Core 978
60% 978 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 113
Parallax 276
123% 180 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 146
Splatting 165
120% 143 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 118%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 384 395 414 418 420 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 363
Write 362
Mixed 256
SusWrite 387
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 45.2
149% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 161
132% 189 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 115%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 162 158 153 157 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 122
Write 130
Mixed 78
SusWrite 158
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
336% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 105%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
2TB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 113 116 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 158
Write 116
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 115
152% 118 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
198% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 61%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB
6GB free, PID 0073
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 38.2
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 38.5
45% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 22%
WD easystore 25FB 1TB
523GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 191 190 190 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 200
Write 161
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 190
212% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 33
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 31.8
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,048
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback