Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UP4  (all builds)
Memory43.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120716
Uptime28.1 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 20:42
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 190
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 586
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.09
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180509a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 46 42 92 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 423
Write 94.2
Mixed 149
SusWrite 76.3
40% 186 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 27.5
99% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 89.1
DQ Mixed 119
92% 129 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
844GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 140 141 140 141 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 167
Write 138
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 140
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
488GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 138 142 141 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 147
Write 123
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 140
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 26.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79-UP4 Builds (Compare 913 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - $480

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $948
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback