Asus UL50VT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus UL50VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UL50VT
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100301
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 19:28
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel U7300
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 27.3
2-Core 52.9
35% 50 Pts
4-Core 53.4
8-Core 52.4
7% 52.9 Pts
64-Core 54.4
3% 54.4 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210M
Asus(1043 1AF2) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8688
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.5% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 0.62
1% 1.82 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.5%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 40GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 28 32 21 35 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 185
Write 34.4
Mixed 48
SusWrite 28.3
16% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 9.8
49% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 38.5
DQ Mixed 41.5
40% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 36%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
210GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 66 62 64 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 59
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 63.9
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5.5
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UL50VT Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UL50VT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback