| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A55M-HD+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150522 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 28 '20 at 10:14 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 52% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 840 Quad Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
34.6%
Below average
|
28% 40.5 Pts
|
18% 131 Pts
|
8% 130 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
MSI(1462 2845) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.3%
Poor
|
24% 32.8 fps
|
27% 33.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 11 9.6 30 35 MB/s
|
16.7%
Very poor
|
25% 33.6 MB/s
|
123% 0.8 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
181GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 48 47 56 56 49 MB/s
|
23.6%
Poor
|
30% 40.2 MB/s
|
81% 0.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20.6%
Poor
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
15% 5.2 GB/s
|
22% 177 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A55M-HD+ Builds (Compare 43 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-HD+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 6x |
| A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples | 5x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples | 4x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 4x |
| Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $116 |