Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z270P-D3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 07:37
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 86.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 257
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 516
68% 511 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Lighting 74.1
Reflection 75.6
Parallax 72.7
60% 74.1 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 71.8
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S11 P 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 328D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 250 251 258 240 251 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,962
Write 565
Mixed 358
SusWrite 265
170% 788 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 69.8
289% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 41.9
DQ Mixed 238
202% 314 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 198%
Great: 268%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
233GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 438 474 313 301 302 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 486
Mixed 461
SusWrite 353
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 66
216% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 126%
Great: 128%
Transcend SSD370 128GB-$74
119GB free
Firmware: N0815C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 153 153 153 153 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 501
Write 154
Mixed 210
SusWrite 153
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 40.3
152% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 151
128% 188 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST980310AS 80GB
74GB free
Firmware: SD03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 67 67 67 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 61
Mixed 38
SusWrite 66.4
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 133 133 131 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 132
Write 133
Mixed 67
SusWrite 132
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 139 139 138 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 145
Write 140
Mixed 66
SusWrite 138
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 81%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 23.2
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270P-D3-CF Builds (Compare 2,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback