Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151001
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '20 at 23:59
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 134
2-Core 267
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 742
74% 602 Pts
64-Core 734
45% 734 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 30.3
28% 32.7 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 31.5
Splatting 31.9
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 960GB
774GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 428 425 368 346 339 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 396
Write 406
Mixed 367
SusWrite 385
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 31
129% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 199
177% 263 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 104%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
138GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1096 1092 1222 930 772 754 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,470
Write 1,220
Mixed 861
SusWrite 977
253% 1,132 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 60.6
212% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 537
402% 544 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 208%
Great: 220%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
545GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 202 201 204 204 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 157
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 202
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
552GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 196 195 195 195 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 137
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 192
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
809GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 176 177 176 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 112
Write 135
Mixed 112
SusWrite 175
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.7
451% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 104%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
898GB free
Firmware: 0737
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 26 34 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 104%
WD Ext HDD 1021 1TB
186GB free
Firmware: 2002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 38.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 27
SusWrite 38.5
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR1 BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR1 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.6% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 24.1
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback