Asus P5E3 Deluxe

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5E3 Deluxe  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100330
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 17 '15 at 04:33
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9770
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 61
2-Core 122
42% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 238
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 295X2 (CrossFire Disabled)
AMD(1002 0B2A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 79.1
48% 66.2 fps
MRender 56.2
Gravity 61.4
Splatting 76.1
54% 64.6 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Volume0 320GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49% Average
Read 444
Write 171
Mixed 220
61% 278 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 7.37
53% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 73.5
DQ Mixed 43.7
54% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49%
Great: 53%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
494GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 116
Write 140
Mixed 116
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.57
142% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 75%
Typical P5E3 Deluxe Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P5E3 Deluxe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback