Biostar TA760G M2+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TA760G M2+  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090304
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '20 at 01:38
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 630
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 92.3
1-Core 29.7
2-Core 51.2
43% 57.7 Pts
4-Core 55.8
8-Core 53.3
7% 54.5 Pts
64-Core 49.1
3% 49.1 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Asus(1043 0462) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 14.4
9% 12.6 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 11.7
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 22 26 14 11 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 64.5
Write 75.3
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 23
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
302GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 53 54 56 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 52.1
Mixed 38
SusWrite 55
38% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 7.4
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback