MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7309
MotherboardMSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)  (all builds)
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 18:28
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 140-$9
CPU1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 43.2
1-Core 14.6
2-Core 21.2
20% 26.3 Pts
4-Core 29.2
8-Core 30.8
4% 30 Pts
64-Core 36.5
2% 36.5 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
MSI(1462 7309) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 7.4 10 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 1.7
Mixed 5.4
SusWrite 9.7
5% 6.82 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB 0h DDR2 800 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 0
SC Write 0.1
SC Mixed 0.1
0% 0.07 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 17%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309) Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback