Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 14:11
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 667
73% 579 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Asus(1043 86CC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.3% Good
Lighting 91.6
Reflection 80.4
Parallax 72.7
75% 81.6 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 72.2
59% 71.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0920A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 45 39 32 34 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 477
Write 51.2
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 42.8
32% 151 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.3
42% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.15278S.004 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.5% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.8
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S Builds (Compare 1,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback