Acer Aspire F5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire F5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Captain_SK
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '17 at 16:06
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 22%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 189
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 302
41% 307 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 108F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4494
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 6.97
6% 9.08 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.17
Splatting 14.9
8% 9.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8151S396GG 96GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.7% Below average
Read 239
Write 73.1
Mixed 108
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 3.38
61% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 4.45
8% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 55%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 95.4
Write 97.1
Mixed 96.8
73% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.32
93% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 ACR24D4S7S1MB-4 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.6% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 20.3
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 19.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire F5-573G Builds (Compare 1,615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback