HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 166F
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110830
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '17 at 14:19
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User EUR-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 105
54% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 180
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
HP(103C 166F) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 1.38
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.41 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 67.6
Mixed 66.6
50% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.23
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 50%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
9GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
8.34% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 13.5
Mixed 15.7
21% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.06
4K Write 0.38
4K Mixed 1.46
78% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
27.5% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 8.4
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback