HP Elite x2 1012 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 73% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP Elite x2 1012 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80FC
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1280 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160909
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '17 at 10:19
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 38%
CPU Throttled 73%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m5-6Y57
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 119
50% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 192
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80FC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4483
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 5.34
5% 6.17 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 10.8
6% 7.46 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68% Good
Read 425
Write 315
Mixed 373
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 19.6
80% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 29.2
60% 124 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 825630-991 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.5
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite x2 1012 G1 Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite x2 1012 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback