Asus M4N68T-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4N68T-M  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 22:52
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 620
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 75.9
41% 60.8 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 147
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
EVGA(3842 2615) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 1.81
2% 2.21 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 1.74
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S3712 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 99 62 58 55 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 234
Write 191
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 74.3
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 17.7
71% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 28.3
DQ Mixed 24.4
19% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 49%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54
176GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 73 73 72 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 67.6
Write 69.1
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 71.2
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 12.1
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N68T-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback