Biostar H61MHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar H61MHV  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 22:05
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 136
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 231
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8576) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 4.84
4% 4.82 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.91 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 70 69 79 84 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 52
SusWrite 69.9
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 88%
Mass Storage Device 8GB
3GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.3 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Read 18
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.3
8% 7.82 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.3
60% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 M378B5773DH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MHV Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback