Asus X441BA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X441BA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X441BA
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 16:32
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Memory 42.5
1-Core 34.8
2-Core 72.4
30% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 92.9
8-Core 89.9
12% 91.4 Pts
64-Core 81
5% 81 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Asus(1043 1FE0) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 2.46
Parallax 1.38
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 1.87
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 263 289 239 148 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 280
Write 324
Mixed 321
SusWrite 225
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 24
80% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 174
133% 178 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5143EB1-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.6% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X441BA Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X441BA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback