Medion E2225 2400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion E2225 2400  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 13:31
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 49.6
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 168
56% 102 Pts
4-Core 93.6
8-Core 120
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 8621) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 15
Parallax 18.2
16% 17.4 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 19.6
15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 100 105 113 121 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 149
Write 156
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 105
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 112%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
8.72% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 17.5
Mixed 18
SusWrite 17.2
24% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
55% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.72%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 0215 CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 11
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E2225 2400 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E2225 2400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback