HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 09:05
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 595
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 1998) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 6.31
Parallax 5.78
3% 5.31 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 7.22
5% 5.94 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solid 240GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 32 17 46 30 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 429
Write 28.3
Mixed 32
SusWrite 33.4
28% 131 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 10.5
86% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 33
DQ Mixed 0.5
26% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
545GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 161 164 164 168 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 145
Write 122
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 162
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 107%
Lio-org FILEIO 16GB
11GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 67 64 65 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F641GU67F1600G Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback