Dell Latitude 3390 2-in-1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude 3390 2-in-1  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 073TVN
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 01:30
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8350U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 414
46% 363 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Dell(1028 0878) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 6.97
6% 8.33 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 15.3
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.32%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500M8960G 960GB
729GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 271 166 132 137 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 334
Write 245
Mixed 248
SusWrite 193
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 9.8
27% 7.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 0198000080AD 9905700-011.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
72.1% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 20.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude 3390 2-in-1 Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude 3390 2-in-1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback