Pegatron IPXSB-H61

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPegatron IPXSB-H61  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPXSB-H61
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101112
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateApr 24 '20 at 22:25
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 126
57% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 176
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 6350
Sapphire(174B 6350) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 1.53
1% 1.51 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 101 110 112 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 112
Write 122
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 110
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 88%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
537GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 90 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 52
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 89.6
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG M2S4G64CB8HB5N-BE 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPXSB-H61 Builds (Compare 337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron IPXSB-H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback