Asus M4N72-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4N72-E  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110414
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 24 '20 at 15:01
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 52.6
2-Core 95.4
50% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 288
30% 239 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 69
Parallax 81.9
52% 71.7 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 56.6
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 25 65 88 94 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 69.3
Write 75.7
Mixed 45
SusWrite 69.2
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
115GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 84 84 83 85 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 67.5
Write 67.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 85.2
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST340014A 34GB
15GB free
Firmware: 3.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 31 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 22.7
Write 30.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 30
19% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.9
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.4
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N72-E Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N72-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback