Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '20 at 23:51
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 104 2-Core 164 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 426 54% 411 Pts	64-Core 427 26% 427 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GRID M40 5 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 110A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.84 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 20.3 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 19.4 16% 18.6 fps	MRender 24.4 Gravity 22.3 Splatting 16.6 17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 18%
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.84 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1600ADFD-60NLR1 160GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20.07P20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 70 72 70 70 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 77 Write 80.7 Mixed 41.7 SusWrite 70 49% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 199% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 49%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 3.5TB free Firmware: SN04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 178 177 96 174 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 176 Mixed 92.4 SusWrite 163 112% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 236% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 105%
WD WD2502ABYS-18B7A0 250GB 1,323 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 146GB free Firmware: 02.03B04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 102 100 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 111 Write 105 Mixed 66.4 SusWrite 102 70% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42 105,447 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 32.5 MC Mixed 28.5 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.2 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 86.6 46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,257x
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,088x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,475x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,850x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,108x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $157Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	869x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	775x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	731x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $118Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	648x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,030

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16