Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T5500-$18 1,616 User benchmarks, average bench 32% U1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	32.9% Below average	Memory 59.9 1-Core 18.9 2-Core 37.6 28% 38.8 Pts	4-Core 38.2 8-Core 36.6 5% 37.4 Pts	64-Core 37.1 2% 37.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7300 116 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0090) 128MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.10.9755 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.38 Parallax 0.09 0% 0.26 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.16% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST9808210A 80GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 19 21 29 28 29 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 30 Write 27.4 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 23.2 18% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 19%
Sony Storage Media 8GB 864 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 0GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 22.9 Write 5.3 Mixed 3 10% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce Go 7300NvidiaBench 0%, 116 samples	8x

SSD
545s Series 512GBIntel $95Bench 107%, 12,034 samples	2x
MT-128 128GBBench 61%, 290 samples	1x

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $205

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16