Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 15:50
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 288
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 779
76% 624 Pts
64-Core 968
60% 968 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 138
Parallax 116
106% 128 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 125
Splatting 104
89% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 941 251 256 252 255 256 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,153
Write 1,200
Mixed 1,175
SusWrite 368
219% 974 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 66.7
237% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 595
DQ Write 1,211
DQ Mixed 871
672% 893 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 182%
Great: 223%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
308GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 389 263 230 233 234 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 372
Write 406
Mixed 365
SusWrite 284
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 31.7
112% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 216 220 220 219 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 211
Write 151
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 218
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 123%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2K3600C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 37.9
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 35.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,005
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback