Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$20 11,349 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 26 2-Core 53.7 35% 49.8 Pts	4-Core 53.3 8-Core 53.4 7% 53.3 Pts	64-Core 54.1 3% 54.1 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 80GB (2007)-$45 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.0 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 65.1 Write 62.8 Mixed 62.9 48% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.32 101% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 49%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	4.28% Terrible	Read 18.6 Write 4.54 Mixed 4.51 9% 9.23 MB/s	4K Read 2.39 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.009 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.28% Great: 7%
USB2.0 Flash Disk 4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 4GB free, PID 0000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	3.04% Terrible	Read 9.43 Write 3.09 Mixed 4.15 6% 5.55 MB/s	4K Read 4.08 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 16% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.04% Great: 3%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	80x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	68x
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $20Bench 37%, 11,349 samples	57x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	54x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	40x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	35x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $128

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16