Asrock B365M IB-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B365M IB-R  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190726
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 09:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 253
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 751
78% 629 Pts
64-Core 739
46% 739 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 2110 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Lighting 99.6
Reflection 90
Parallax 85.8
81% 91.8 fps
MRender 77.8
Gravity 84.2
Splatting 82.3
67% 81.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 95 28 39 22 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 464
Write 397
Mixed 39
SusWrite 80.5
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 1.7
39% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 1.4
63% 145 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
618GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 191 192 192 192 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 144
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 191
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D12.2324CS.001 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 12.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 14.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M IB-R Builds (Compare 3,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B365M IB-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $789
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback