HP h8-1103nl

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP h8-1103nl  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 01:58
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 159
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 459
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2AB5) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.24% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.16
1% 1.41 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.43
2% 1.82 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.24%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 442 433 404 213 212 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 433
Mixed 423
SusWrite 353
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 40.4
128% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 277
231% 333 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: MN5OA5Q0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 68 83 78 78 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 126
Write 122
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 78.1
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 14
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1103nl Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1103nl

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback